Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login

So, finally they admitted the long time fraud publicly. Anne Frank's diary was co-authored
by her father and thus the credibility of the book finally comes to an end.

The Basel, Switzerland, Anne Frank Fonds (Anne Frank Fund), which controls the copyright
to the Diary of Anne Frank, has admitted that the book was in fact at least co-authored by
Otto Frank, Anne’s father, after the war.

The admission proves that the book, which is still heavily promoted as a "holocaust memoir",
is in fact largely a postwar fabrication which contained parts of the young Anne’s diary with
extensive additions added by her father. This is obvious from even a cursory look at the actual
diary. See, for example, the image below of two pages from the diary, which shows both Anne’s
real youthful handwriting and her father’s obviously adult handwriting, although he signs his
entries as “Anne Frank.”

Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne Frank died of
typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public domain in
February 2015.
But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to try to
extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period by admitting that Otto Frank,
who died in 1980, was indeed a "co-author" after all.

Foundation officials "should think very carefully about the consequences", said Agnès Tricoire,
a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics have been
the most vociferous and are organizing a challenge. "If you follow their arguments, it means that
they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.

People already knew that the dairy was written with a BIC ballpoint pen, which was only a prototype
at that time and was in no way industrialized, let alone sold on the market.
They were commercialized
in 1951
. This already permitted many people to determine the book to be a fraud as it was physically
impossible, unless, Anne Frank had a way to travel through time, to the future and then return with
a BIC ballpoint pen...

Otto Frank, the father of Anne Frank made millions out of the death of her daughter. This is a
disgusting display of macabre money making, thus by doing so he shows no respect for her daughter
or her memory, while non-Jews are supposed to cry out for the faked, fantasized story this man
made us believe was true. I truly hope this new victory of truth will open the eyes of many about
the true nature of Judaism. It is not moral, it is a barbaric ideology of supremacy, hatred and lies.

Well be to you all,
Hail victory,

Der Himmelstern


Anime: Youjo Senki! German WWI lolicon at war!
Visit our group :iconfascist-anime:
Youjo Senki Episode 1
Youjo Senki Episode 2
Youjo Senki Episode 3
Youjo Senki Episode 4
Youjo Senki Episode 5
Youjo Senki Episode 6
Youjo Senki Episode 7
Youjo Senki Episode 8
NS appeal in Asian culture.
Students give the "Heil Hitler" salute and carry Nazi banners and insignia in photos posted
to the internet, which also show a cardboard tank with German military markings.

According to local media, the December 23 parade was part of a cosplay event, a common
activity where people dress up as characters from popular culture.

"The outcry over the Nazi costumes in Taiwan, while obviously offensive to those ((("educated")))
on this terrible period in history, should remind us of the dangers of cultural relativism,".

"For East Asian countries, World War II was not about the Nazis or Hitler but rather the
Imperial Japanese forces. Comparatively little time is spent in Asian countries studying
World War II Ge
The First Holocaust : The Origin of the 6 millions
The First Holocaust The Surprising Origin of the Six-Million Figure(PDF):
Larger list of 278 entries about 6 million Jews between 1900 and 1945:
Six Million Open Gates (ORIGINAL ARTICLES):

This video demonstrated irrefutably how the "6.000.000 exterminated
Jews" claim is preposterous and is found back as far as the mid 1800's.
We will discover, by looking at original articles how this scam was used
to further Jewish Zionist interests, with the purpose of draining massive
amounts of money, and went as far as to promote Bolshevism. The main
Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big LieDuration: 2h 05min 48sec
The Last Days of the Big Lie is a documentary which debunks the
disgusting liars glorified as heroes and victims in the Steven Spielberg
produced, Academy Award winning "Holocaust" documentary The Last
The Last Days of the Big Lie uses Spielberg's Oscar winning hoax as a
jumping off point to debunk Spielberg's USC Survivors of the Shoah
Visual History Foundation as well as the greater Holocaust Hoax.
Created by Eric Hunt,
NB: Due to excessive length, I upload this documentary as a journal entry.
Upload inspired by :iconthe-mad-walker:

Robert Faurisson - The gas chambers problem by Der-Himmelstern
Ernst Zundel - Off Your Knees Germany!This media documentary traces Ernst Zundel's history from his arrival in Canada
to his cases of revisionist publishings, which were persecuted by Jewish lobbies
in court cases. These cases travel through time from 1983 to at least 2003 with
shocking ressemblances in social mayhem that we are currently witnessing
after Trump's nomination and the violences that arises from it. The same
multicultural forces that were at work by then are still active now. Follow Zundel
through his years long battle of research, trial and prison sentences. The new
Jewish inquisition tried their best, but truth cannot be kept imprisoned eternally.
Other revisionists concerned by the video include: Robert Faurisson, Fred Leuchter.
Consider visiting the Zundel Site:

Robert Faurisson - The gas chambers problem by Der-Himmelstern

Did the Holocaust Really Happen - Steven Anderson by Der-Himmelstern

Mature Content

Questioning The Holocaust - Why We Believed Part1 by Der-Himmelstern
Holocaust faker explains himself by Der-Himmelstern Fred Leuchter investigation of alleged gassings by Der-Himmelstern SIX MILLION JEWS 1915 1938 HD by Der-Himmelstern Robert Faurisson - The gas chambers problem by Der-Himmelstern


Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use"
for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair
use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit,
educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Free Skin by SimplySilent &
modified by Der-Himmelstern
  • Listening to:
  • Reading: Praktischer Idealismus - Coudenhove-Kalergi
Add a Comment:
mikamiga Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
This doesn't surprise me at all.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2017
Many had warned about the obvious fraud but it seems
holocaust propaganda has more impact on people's minds
than facts.
ZacharyTC Featured By Owner Edited Dec 19, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
Reading the new York times article, it says that Otto “created a new work” because of his role of editing, merging and trimming entries from her diary and notebooks and reshaping them into “kind of a collage” meriting its own copyright." That by itself is a little too vague to determine whether it was a forgery. Until more evidence surfaces, I am going to give Otto the benefit of the doubt and not lose my head in paranoia.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Dec 19, 2016
The Anne Frank foundation admitted that Otto Frank is
co-author, that is, composing half the actual text himself,
so that they can continue to get royalties on this work.
So yes, half the dairy, at least, is an admitted forgery.
One must be truly naive to believe Anne Frank would
have two distinct writings in the first place.
ZacharyTC Featured By Owner Dec 19, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
I'm not seeing any evidence that he did anything but compile everything Anne wrote into one cohesive work.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Dec 21, 2016
Anne Frank did not write what Otto Frank wrote.
Pretending to fail at understanding this evident
fact will not maintain this fraud alive.
ZacharyTC Featured By Owner Dec 21, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
Claiming she did not write it does not make the claim true, Gobbels. It is just as asinine to assume that as it is to say that Jesus was somehow blonde with blue eyes while stating that you "do not need to prove it with scholarship or science! It is so!"

Newsflash: No evidence, no argument.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Dec 21, 2016
I've rarely seen someone wishing to believe
his own nonsense to that extreme.

- Two distinct writing.
- Official admissions from the Anne Frank foundation.

What else needs to be said? You are the only
one who disagrees with this blatant, admitted
fraud. Where is your scholarship or science?
ZacharyTC Featured By Owner Dec 23, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
I've rarely seen someone wishing to believe
his own nonsense to that extreme.
Right back at you. You don't know beans from buckshot, you ol' cock-a-doodle-doo. I've seen enough disputes to know when somebody is relying on assumed gullibility, thus the application of insults to a reader's intelligence. Then again, this is the internet, where stupidity reigns supreme. I'm not surprised you are exploiting that detail.

Where is your scholarship or science, Goebbels? Apart from the New York Times, the sources you provide are bogus. Two of them are essentially Holocaust denial websites (all of which essentially rely on fear and emotion rather than logic or scholarship (not surprising, since the heavy reliance upon fear and emotion was exactly Hitler's tactic)) and likely filled to the brim with anti-Semitism and conspiracy theories surrounding those two things. And, anyone in the Philosophy and Religion forum can tell you of my distrust of such an easy-to-edit website as Wikipedia. If you truly want to have a scholarly bent, try quoting actual historians with a either a Master's or PhD in History and/or related fields, okay?

Two distinct writings. By your logic, every publisher whom has ever reconstructed older works from fragments into something as cohesive as possible is a fraud. Goodbye, Iliad and Odyssey! You're going to have to do better than a display of different handwriting fonts to convince me.
Official admissions from the Anne Frank foundation. Coming from someone who laps up conspiracy theories so readily, that is not a convincing statement. At any rate, why are we not hearing such an "admission" from Otto himself? Oh, that's right! He's dead! Not that it matters: a closer reading of the New York Times article shows that the member of the foundation's board mentioned in there stated the reason for Otto being declared a co-author was because of his role in "editing, merging and trimming entries from her diary and notebooks and reshaping them into “kind of a collage” meriting its own copyright." It is in the ninth paragraph, black and white, clear as crystal. It hardly makes for an "admission to fraud". Not to mention, the article also states a dispute over which organization has legal rights over certain materials concerning the topic of Anne Frank. Until that is resolved, all we can do is wait until more information comes up.

What else needs to be said? You are the only
one who disagrees with this blatant, admitted
You mean, the only one with a brain that is functional enough to know when his opponent is relying on his audience's lack of critical thinking in order to garner his agenda dishonestly. If there is hardly anybody commenting whom questions your conspiracy theory, it is likely because such people not present do not consider you worth their time and effort. I can't exactly blame them.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2016
My, my, this is funny. What is so complicated
to understand about the fact that all sides
agree on this fact?
You are letting your holocaust religion blind you.
Even the Anne Frank foundation would be
wondering what you are talking about. Basically
you are contradicting the Anne Frank foundation
itself. The hard fact is the actual diary and the
official admissions of the foundation.

An infinite amount of empty talk and buzzwords
won't change this pure and simple fact.
(2 Replies)
cricketboone Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2016
 I don't believe this at all, my mom grew up in Germany during this time & others as well can account for what happened when it came to the arrest of Jews. This is another attempt to change another part of history to suit certain peoples views on any kind of history.
AkiraSukashi Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Oh boy am I late here... Well to big surprise I as well have german ancestors, they didn't inprison jews actually, jews themselves banished 'unpure' families (where one of the members has no judaic roots) from their communities as it is against Judaism to marry or have children with person representing other religion or race. Now these 'unpurities' there the ones sent to camps BY THEIR OWN JEWISH COMMUNITY.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Dec 18, 2016
It is always interesting to see people complain
about criminals being arrested because of their
Judaic religion. This seems biased to me.
FritzDusquesne Featured By Owner Oct 25, 2016
"Nitrobutane" you claim that "forensic examination... has long ago proven". How can this be possible if the original manuscripts are only publicly accessible very recently? Has this been subjected to various handwriting experts? Or just the ones approved by the copyright holders? If the latter, as expected, then we have all the reason in the world to doubt it.

The article above simply points out the logical discrepancy: if Anne Frank was the ONLY author, then on what grounds are they seeking to EXTEND the copyright (that expired in 2015) in the name of her father, to continue until 2050?

Crying "holocaust denial" doesn't resolve this discrepancy, since the only conclusion one can draw from it, is that Anne Frank couldn't have been the sole author.

The diabolical in this case is NOT those who seek the truth, but those that believe that can control all truths, who see them as "God's chosen race" and superior to all. Its common cause that if legislation is needed to uphold "facts", then those facts are mere weak representations of a set of quasi-religious beliefs.

Next you'd probably yell "anti-Semitism" but that won't work either, as most rational people support the independence of the Palestinian Semites, for one. 

The only "sympathy" one can strive for, is for truth and knowledge. Best you get on board with that too.

The Magna Carta of the 21st century is coming!
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Oct 25, 2016
When you see two very distinct writings, you don't
need an "expert" to understand that two distinct
persons wrote it. Simply look at the above picture.
It is beyond doubt.

A new Magna Carta would be needed since political
correctness appears to cause truth to suffocate. Our
current vision of history seems to be an almost religious
dogma. It somehow reminds me of the inquisition.
Today one can be jailed for an opinion about the
so-called holocaust.
nitrobutane Featured By Owner Mar 16, 2016
Forensic examination of Anne Frank's handwriting has long ago proven the handwriting is hers.
What these lies of yours are subtly working towards, is Holocaust denial!! It is triply poisonous. It tries to present those who stand up for Holocaust victims, as making a terrible false accusation. It tries to present Holocaust perpetrators as victims of false accusaton (and therefore sympathetic). It tries to conceal the true diabolical nature of what extreme right ideology is capable of.
TheGameartist03 Featured By Owner Nov 28, 2016  Student Digital Artist
Don't listen to this guy. You two just have different opinions, that's all.
nitrobutane Featured By Owner Dec 10, 2016
But, they're not just 'different opinions' though. If one is merely a statement of historical fact, and the other a racism-justifying rejection of a truth that doesn't fit a specific prejudice (what's nowadays called 'truthiness'), there is a difference.
TheGameartist03 Featured By Owner Dec 10, 2016  Student Digital Artist
tbh that guy was a bit of a butt
I tried reasoning with him but they just sent me an essay of a reply saying "Ooh Anne Frank was a fraud! The Holocaust never existed! Auschwitz had a pool and a bar and all those Jews were just there on vacation they actually just got tanned in the spa! No one got incinerated and killed!"
Seriously what is his problem???
nitrobutane Featured By Owner Dec 11, 2016
Ughh... there's just something so poisonous about an atrocity denial.
Firstly it accuses that group of people of creating a tremendous false accusation
Secondly, it tries removing sympathy from that group (so they can be freely hated)
Thirdly it tries to deny the evils racism/ideology is capable of.
Me, I think these people aren't just 'logically wrong', but 'morally wrong'. Wilfully twisting the truth to justify descending into the nastier, more primitive parts of their own brain - and then spreading more hate.
Although there's also the issue of upbringing by racist family, and their associates...
TheGameartist03 Featured By Owner Dec 11, 2016  Student Digital Artist
Yeah. You gotta remember that these people really are good at heart, and they believe that their intentions are good. Everyone has a different view of the world, and of "truth"
It's amazing what lengths people will go to just to prove a point about what they believe is right. Trust me, I know...
nitrobutane Featured By Owner Edited Mar 6, 2017
about that... I'm somehow convinced that people who are wilfully self deceiving, have bad intentions, b/c they know their actions will make things worse, but they're acting out of self interest.
"Everyone has a different view of the world, and of "truth" " - this is true, but kind of different somehow from what I said before.
TheGameartist03 Featured By Owner Mar 6, 2017  Student Digital Artist
Yeah, I've found out recently that some people just enjoy being mean or doing bad things. But it's only because they're hurting inside and they only want others to feel their pain.
People just want to do what's only best for them sometimes, and I'll accept that. But you can rise above that and look around at what others feel.
I'm not saying you only do what's in your best interest, I was just saying you as in people you, not specifically you.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Mar 16, 2016
No poor soul, Anne Franks writing is co-authored, thus it is a
forgery. And you know how we are sure of it? Because the
Anne Franck foundation openly admitted the fraud.…

So you better throw your "examination" in the garbage.
Even the NYTimes wrote an article on this. So keep on dreaming
about your "holocaust" myths. I just love the face of shocked people
that believe these lies when the "holocaust" scammers admit the
obvious fraud themselves. Gullible people like you just makes me
laugh straight out. Here is another "holocaust" fraud admitted:…

Now return to your "holocaust" fictional Hollywood movies created
by Spielberg and keep on being a good obedient gullible goyim.
Before I forget, don't stop giving guilt money to those people trough
your taxes, Israel could maybe have to stop exterminating Palestinians
if they lack the free money, they can thank your naive mind.
TheGameartist03 Featured By Owner Nov 28, 2016  Student Digital Artist
Really. Flipping really. I'm not believing a word of this. People have different opinions on authenticity, and that's ok! So no need to be mean or anything towards each other.
But seriously! That last part was completely unnecessary! The holocaust happened, it's over and done with, there's all kind of controversy (which personally I think is ridiculous) but there's no right for any insulation or arguments over it.
I didn't want to get into this, just needed to do research for school and this popped up.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Nov 30, 2016
If you are making research about the presumed holocaust
then I can guarantee you that no plan a extermination on
the Jews was ever found. Don't take my word for it, search
for such an order. Fortunately, it doesn't exist.
TheGameartist03 Featured By Owner Nov 30, 2016  Student Digital Artist
Hmm. I'm still not sure. Thanks for not being super hateful though. It's nice to know that some people are still civil nowadays.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Dec 1, 2016
Usually I'm very kind and well mannered but the problem is
all these people who are indoctrinated in these schools all
come and attack genuine research about the holocaust in
very aggressive ways. They don't look at the evidence, they
just parrot back the propaganda they take as granted truth.

In reality decades of research have irrefutably demonstrated
that the holocaust is a fraud of history. I believe these videos
are a good start for digging into the subject:……
(Example of fraud lying "witness" of the holocaust)…
(archive material in the description of chemical analysis of the presumed gas-chambers)…
(mathematical impossibility of mass-cremation capacities)…
(6.000.000 number fraud with massive amounts of archive material)…
(The supposed dictatorship imposed by the Reich was a 100% democratic event)…
(The admitted Anne Franck diary Fraud admitted by the Anne Frank foundation)

There are many more, but I believe the point has been made.
TheGameartist03 Featured By Owner Dec 3, 2016  Student Digital Artist
I got to fraud and I'm gonna stop you there.
Just going to point out that it happened and I had a relative who almost got caught up in it.
However, before I flip out, why do you believe after all that's happened, after everyone that's died, and all the shiz that people went through and still  remember, what justifies you to say the Holocaust was a fraud? Who's to say the documents you linked in your reply aren't frauds? Maybe we're both wrong. Who knows? It was along time ago.
DaSpineLessFish Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2017
Can you prove him wrong though? You haven't refuted any of his points. 
(1 Reply)
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Dec 5, 2016
I believe you should definitely look at the testimonies
about the camps, not the cherry-picked liars of the Jewish
lobbyist media and movie industry, but rather the tens of
thousands that you can access in the archive databases.
They explain that Auschwitz had a swimming pool, theater,
hospital, library, football terrain, orchestra and even a brothel.

Either you are interested in the truth about this subject and
give the links I showed a chance, either you simply wish to
blindly believe in the holocaust religion and will refuse to
acknowledge any evidence provided to you. Some testimonies
are pure and simply impossible by mathematical and physical
standards. Oven capacities, existing documents, budgets and
scientific calculations and analyses simply don't function with
these spooky gas chambers and extermination stories.

What happened is very simple. People were put into camps,
some partisans were shot as is the case for any army on earth,
and at the end of the war, with roads, supplies and factories
being systematically bombed by the Allies, could not provide
Zycklon B to get rid of the lice pandemics in the camps, and people
died of Typhus. The Allies, having committed massive atrocities
against the Germans needed to demonize them to look like saviors.
With the help of lying Jewish lobbyists, they made these stories
up without the need for concrete evidence and based solely on the
presumed testimonies of payed and hate filled liars. The Jewish
controlled industry, book publishing companies and educational
ministries of most Western countries, have made a very profitable
business out of this, as well as a political tool for power.

If you are genuinely interested in this topic, give these videos
a try. If you just wish to be convinced that the holocaust happened
regardless of evidence then nothing more needs to be added.
whateverman32 Featured By Owner Edited Mar 19, 2016  Student Artist
You just took this guy to school, mon ami.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Mar 21, 2016
Yes I know. Thank you for the compliment.
whateverman32 Featured By Owner Mar 21, 2016  Student Artist
We may share different ideologies, but the truth is the truth, no matter the ideology.
aWay-with-knives Featured By Owner Feb 13, 2016  Student General Artist
interesting.... there is much to research
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Feb 14, 2016
Yes indeed. Let's not let other
people do our thinking for us.
aWay-with-knives Featured By Owner Feb 14, 2016  Student General Artist
amen. thanks for compelling my interest,
I firmly resolutely believe that the world
would be healthier, happier, more-inclusive
and more-productive, had a nazi or confederate
victory, come to fruition
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Feb 15, 2016
That is probably true indeed.
aWay-with-knives Featured By Owner Feb 16, 2016  Student General Artist
and the rest of the world would write us off, if they heard us say these things
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Feb 16, 2016
Naturally we will be the persecuted minority.
Our persecutors will then argue that we are evil
and thus all evil done to us is justifiable.
What those short-sighted people don't manage
to understand is the fact that if they support
persecution on us today, they might be the next
ones, tomorrow. 
aWay-with-knives Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2016  Student General Artist
people are too short sighted to ever see that coming. it's crazy how that works. the ones who were persecuted and subjected to indignities that we had no part in, the rebel against us when we try to save them. zionist jews make me lose my shit!!
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2016
The worst of all is that they use their media control
to persuade the masses to hate and persecute
the only political ideologies that can actually free them.

They literally manipulate people into putting chains to
themselves and believing that those chains are freedom...
(1 Reply)
The ball pen was invented by a jew. Otto Frank was not only a jew but also a businessman. It is very likely that he was a close friend of the inventor, so he had one before they were on the market.

Now let's put a few other things straight:
The number of deaths in WWII was far less than 6 millions.
These deaths were not only jews, but also gipsies, homesexuals, handicapped persons and people who simply opposed the nazis.

And most important of all:
There is a big difference between a jew and a zionist. Nearly everything that is wrong with this world is to be blamed on zionists; not jews! Not every jew is a zionist and not every zionist is a jew.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Feb 12, 2016
Firstly that ballpoint pen argument of yours is
probably unfounded.

Secondly, there were indeed Jews, Gypsies homosexuals,
handicapped people who were put into camps.
In our current so-called "democratic" societies we do just
just the same with prisons. Basically what a labor camp
is, is a prison where you need to work, pretty much like...
...well a prison. The fact of being homosexual, a Gypsy or
anything else is irrelevant here. The reason why those
people were put in camps is exactly the same as for current
day prisons; criminality.
People died during WWII, yes. Their homosexuality or their
handicap has nothing to do with it. Also I should point out
that there were thousand times more people who died
that were neither homosexual, handicapped, Gypsy or even
Jewish, so please keep that irrelevant and unrepresentative
minority argument for yourself.

Thirdly, Jews didn't needed Zionism to commit the terrible
and hateful crimes they are perpetrating today. Since the
earliest days of Judaism, they have been promoting hatred
of non Jews and believing in their holiness as a "superior
race", permitting themselves to steal, rape and even kill
non Jews like cattle. This current doctrine is specifically
shocking because it is extremely old and unchanged.
In the current epoch these ideas, promoted in Judaism are
literally retarded in terms of intellectual progress.
Jews already acted like they do now since time immemorial,
thousands of years before Zionism was ever to be invented. 
whateverman32 Featured By Owner Edited Feb 9, 2016  Student Artist
Damn, this Otto guy is one sick FUCK!
What kind of sick fuck would make money off of their daughter's death?
Otto, rest in piss and burn in Hell motherfucker.

This is one time that İ'm glad our schools don't go in depth about the supposed 6 million Jewish dead. (Because most of us hate Jews, not me though, İ hate the Kabbalistic Zionism)
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Feb 9, 2016
Yes his insanity is limitless. Jewish doctrine
at it's best. To me there is no such thing
as a non religious Jew. Judaism is a religion
after all.
whateverman32 Featured By Owner Feb 10, 2016  Student Artist
Judaism is a religion, yes.
But this is NOT okay according to the Tawrat.
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Feb 12, 2016
Maybe the Talmud is more forgiving about it?
whateverman32 Featured By Owner Edited Feb 12, 2016  Student Artist
Perhaps that's the case.
They have always rejected His words, they have killed many of their prophets (i.e Prophet Yahya (John the Baptist in the Bible)), they have tried to crucify the holy Messiah, they have tried to assassinate the holy prophet Muhammad etc.

We saved them from the Spaniards during the İnquisition and this is how they repay us, by forming a illegitimate land on the holy Jerusalem.

İ can't say İ'm surprised.
Add a Comment:

:iconder-himmelstern: More from Der-Himmelstern

Featured in Collections

Journal, rant, darama, info, opinion by jerukmasamanis

More from DeviantArt


Submitted on
January 24, 2016


87,490 (5 today)
24 (who?)